Larry Thompson
Friday, March 12, 2004
IT DEPENDS ON YOUR DEFINITION OF "SEIZED".
The 10th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals held that a defendant was not "seized" when a drug sniffing dog approached him, sniffed his groin area, and sat down next to him.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Newer Post
Older Post
Home
View mobile version
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment